Road Congestion Charges
Moderator: Dangerous Bob
-
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 7:47 pm
- Location: Middlesbrough
- Contact:
<a href="http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/traveltax/" target="_blank">http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/traveltax/</a>
Everyone sign please
UK residents only
Everyone sign please
UK residents only
[img]http://www.mbeever.co.uk/[GSV]Phant0m.jpg[/img]
-
- GSV Spammer
- Posts: 1835
- Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:19 pm
- Contact:
Sounds like a good idea to me. It's only the price that I'd object to.
The guidelines they've issued so far means that I'd be better off......
Article in the paper reported that even though thousands have signed this thing, it's not going to alter the Governments thinking.
The guidelines they've issued so far means that I'd be better off......
Article in the paper reported that even though thousands have signed this thing, it's not going to alter the Governments thinking.
Last edited by Dangerous Bob on Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Terrible tax in it's principle. Not examined the detail though. I do hope this is not another assault on the rural population. My worst fear about this kind of tax is that it is a restriction on Labour movement which can only lead to a reduction is standards of living. At the moment we have areas around here where those on medium to lower incomes cannot live. The only way that they can staff the lower paid jobs in these areas is for people to travel (and there is no effective public transport in rural areas). This comes against a background of things like hospital closures and centralisation where staff and patients have to travel further (It's likely soon that our nearest A&E will be 40 miles away). Also our local post offices are closing at a rate of knots.
I'm surprised there is so much opposition though. The urban population ought to be much better...and the worst off? I guess people like us who want to stay in the area in which they were born yet travel for decent work. I just wish we had a socialist government or even a chance to vote for a socialist party.
I'm surprised there is so much opposition though. The urban population ought to be much better...and the worst off? I guess people like us who want to stay in the area in which they were born yet travel for decent work. I just wish we had a socialist government or even a chance to vote for a socialist party.
-
- GSV Regular
- Posts: 1320
- Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 7:04 pm
- Location: Residing in the fantasy of my mind!
- Contact:
I don't know Clingy although I think it will probably hit the Rural populations hardest I personally see this as badly affecting everyone. On the back of it they have claimed that they will scrap normal road taxing and I believe their was talk of scrapping road fuel tax.
But as with all things like this, what they say now and what actually happens are 2 totally different things, so they'll probably end up keeping the other taxes and just lumping this one on top
If you consider their is approximately 24million cars on the roads today, taking no account of people owning more than 1 car then I believe the current level of that petition is about 6.5% of the driving populace.
I also notice that no counter petition has popped up with any significant numbers of people signing it.
But as with all things like this, what they say now and what actually happens are 2 totally different things, so they'll probably end up keeping the other taxes and just lumping this one on top
If you consider their is approximately 24million cars on the roads today, taking no account of people owning more than 1 car then I believe the current level of that petition is about 6.5% of the driving populace.
I also notice that no counter petition has popped up with any significant numbers of people signing it.
I know what you are saying Myo, but everyone wants lower taxes (and higher government spending). So unless you think any particular administration is more inefficient than another, taxes benefit us all. Personally I'd like to see higher taxes. What we perhaps all against here is that the motorist is shouldering an unfair proportion of taxes. But at the moment with the green lobby so dominant in the media it's going to be so more difficult to defend. My main issue is that, as rural dwellers (ooo arhhh), we have no option but to use the roads.
My solution would be to increase speeding fines dramatically and place many more speeding cameras in camoflaged locations.
/me dons flame retardant suit.
My solution would be to increase speeding fines dramatically and place many more speeding cameras in camoflaged locations.
/me dons flame retardant suit.
Less people are smoking, so less tax revenue there. (Which is good for people, bad for Government)
Is the lottery as popular as it once was? I've never bothered with it but people don't talk about it as much so I can imagine it isn't. Casino's, if any will take them seriously, their reinvention is still undergoing establishment - so no immediate revenue there for the Government.
Hiking fuel prices on a permanent basis has too much profile, people notice this in a very direct way at the pump or when they choose their garage. However there has been a measure of success in sporadic hikes, quick bursts of revenue, and then a quick drop to make people feel they are empowered.
Tax on alcohol, a sure thing as long as Clingy doesn't leave the country.
Road congestion charges, an immediate two pronged burst of cash in the form of those who pay full whack at first then after that as they start paying the hiked prices of public transport in an attempt to "save" money.
It pays for the war, an influx of immigrants who this country robbed in the first place, and in the furor provides a smokescreen for any other things Governments do when the people are looking the other way.
I could be wrong though... they might even be concerned about the environment...
Is the lottery as popular as it once was? I've never bothered with it but people don't talk about it as much so I can imagine it isn't. Casino's, if any will take them seriously, their reinvention is still undergoing establishment - so no immediate revenue there for the Government.
Hiking fuel prices on a permanent basis has too much profile, people notice this in a very direct way at the pump or when they choose their garage. However there has been a measure of success in sporadic hikes, quick bursts of revenue, and then a quick drop to make people feel they are empowered.
Tax on alcohol, a sure thing as long as Clingy doesn't leave the country.
Road congestion charges, an immediate two pronged burst of cash in the form of those who pay full whack at first then after that as they start paying the hiked prices of public transport in an attempt to "save" money.
It pays for the war, an influx of immigrants who this country robbed in the first place, and in the furor provides a smokescreen for any other things Governments do when the people are looking the other way.
I could be wrong though... they might even be concerned about the environment...
Just be a nutter... life becomes much more exciting, and people won't expect anything more of you...