Claw wrote:
Wow, Myo, you've got some issues going on there m8. I think we're gonna see you on camera soon...
except I'm not the one hiding behind cameras and running scared at all times that the boogy men are going to get me and we need to be protected by the state. Personally I think I'm pretty likely to be the one prosecuted as I'm fed up of a culture where the victim is the criminal and isn't allowed to stand up and be counted, less the sheep and nanny state hide behind their so called camera weilding security.
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Video evidence is admissible, and is used as such. End of...<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If it relates to the case in question then yes it is, but what you've said is that any evidence of previous capture on video not related to the case would be reviewed. That is not the case, it's completely inadmissable as evidence so I'm not sure what your getting at here.
This is what you said previously: <!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->cameras do contribute to identifying a criminal trend whether or not prosecuted<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
As I said before a judge is not going to be able to consider video evidence where a person is not convicted so would not be able to pick up on a criminal trend and as far as I am aware the CPS and police would not be able to use such evidence in any other cases.
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->You personally know that the vast majority of the law enforcement bodies throughout this country are criminals?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<a href="
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... ivers.html" target="_blank">Article on the most convicted parts of society</a>
A small excerpt for you: <!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->"Legal eagles have the most convictions for flouting speed limits, jumping red lights or using mobile phones at the wheel.
Analysis of 1.6 million motor insurance policies revealed that one in five has penalty points on their driving licence.
That is more than twice as many as hairdressers and beauticians who have the fewest blemishes on their record.
Those working in the medical profession are the second most likely to flout the laws of the road followed by religious leaders, police officers and teachers.
The surprising results are based on checks by insurance giant Admiral of motor policies taken out last year."<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Therefore if they're in the most convicted of RTA offences then a vast number of them are CRIMINALS as they've commited a criminal offence, yet they are allowed to remain working in our judicial and criminal system. A Police officer used to have to be above reproach, now they can be common criminal scum and keep the job. Doesn't really send out the correct message to the rest of society if the police and judges can get away with it, then why not the rest of us.
I've also watched a few of these police programs recently and the level of unessessary violence that police officers subject suspects to is rather shocking, and yet they openly publicise it on TV. You've only got to look at the case of the police officer who pushed the Ian Tomlinson an innocent bystander to the ground and beating him to his ultimate death, but yet has been brushed under the carpert. If I did that I'd be locked up for murder, yet the police officer involved is not even facing manslaughter charges. This country seriously has lost it tbh.
<!--quoteo--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE</div><div class='quotemain'><!--quotec-->Sterilise the dumb social spongers? I suppose upper class halfwit numpties would much prefer to quaff with the strictly blonde haired and blue eyed genetically perfected master race of Aryans? Where have we heard that rhetoric before?
Well I'm glad you're changing your view...
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Claw, the people you talk about are unlikely to be in the general school population so how would a camera pick them up. Also do you really see that debate of class having a huge amount to do with it, you obviously haven't watched a few of the programs recently where a much larger part of the population are millionaires and are considered upper class. Upper class halfwit numpties aren't in the demographic of disrupting classes at school and requiring punishment. But your very set on dishing out punishment left right and centre for any minor discretion